THE Scottish Government’s most recent Programme for Government (here) highlights the importance of achieving net-zero, improving health and wellbeing, and creating a fairer and greener economy.
In response to these objectives, the now-approved fourth National Planning Framework (NPF4)(here) forms the policy and spatial framework for having sustainable, liveable and productive places.
As Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy, Kate Forbes MSP stated in her foreword to the National Strategy for Economic Transformation (here) early last year: “We will be judged on the outcomes we deliver, not the strategy we write. Words and intentions matter, but only actions deliver change.”
Ms Forbes is right, which begs the question of how can the NPF4 words be delivered?
Fundamentally, NPF4 is about promoting and shaping housing and place development.
During NPF4 discussions, many planning stakeholders understandably argued for more resources.
This means more than employing additional planners. It is about critically assessing the right resources and getting the right people to do the right things, to optimise impact and benefit. This should include a greater commitment to empowering communities in planning their places, engaging with wider built environment professionals and partnering with investors. All these stakeholders have different skills and experiences that can contribute towards the policy objectives.
Climate change has been with us for over 100 years, but real focus has been painfully slow.
Much of the focus on addressing climate change has been through the promotion of technology, which is more legible and easier for politicians to manage.
However, it is increasingly recognised that the real key to change lies in society’s behaviour, habits and customs. Change needs to be a ‘mindset shift’, rather than expecting technology to fix the problem.
NPF4 sets a radical challenge for all those engaged in the Scottish planning system, by demanding that we do things significantly differently.
It is effectively a social mandate for all of us – living closer together, being more connected and moving around by ‘active’ transportation. However, societal behaviour is incremental, with change needing to be clear, simple and established by persuasion. This means ‘nudging’ our habits and customs to fit with the way we should live in the future.
Change will not work if we adopt the traditional approach of preparing plans in the hope that somebody might read them and be sufficiently motivated to work with ambition rather than finding ways of avoiding the policy intention.
Change has to be signalled, taken up by peer groups and ultimately owned by everyone. A significant amount of all carbon emissions come from our homes; therefore, this is a collective challenge that involves everyone.
A 2022 survey by the Office for National Statistics (here) highlighted that three out of every four UK adults population are worried about climate change. Some 75 per cent of adults said they had made a lot or some lifestyle changes to help tackle climate change, lower than the percentage found a year previously (81 per cent). And one in four adults (25 per cent) said they had made no changes, up from 19 per cent the previous year.
Behavioural scientists suggest that we only need to get a quarter of the population to buy into change, for them to influence everybody else. Therefore, how do we get a quarter of Scottish people to be our ambassadors?
A starting point would be for our politicians and planners to understand the principles of applying the ‘nudge theory’, where people are presented with choices rather than being told to do things – ‘budge theory’ – which generally fails to work.
Change must be framed as a positive move, meaning climate empowerment is enacted at the street level rather than in the corridors of power.
People fear the climate emergency, but bringing change through employing restrictions and generally worrying people is unlikely to bring a fruitful outcome.
We need positive encouragement from planners and politicians.
This means planning should return to its original function of acting as the delivery agent for such national priorities.
This requires political leadership and investment to achieve an inclusive mindset shift that involves its citizens.
We are running out of time, but change will not happen overnight. The first thing is to do the easy things and allow people to recognise why change is needed.
Citizen involvement is crucial as behaviour will not change until such cultural practice is normalised.
Steven Tolson is chair of the Housing and Place Delivery Forum at the UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence (CaCHE). He is also a former chair of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Scotland). This is a slightly amended version of an article appearing originally on the CaCHE website (here) – for which, grateful thanks. CaCHE is organising an event on NPF4, scheduled for April 24 – here.
Pictured: Dumfries, Picture credit: Place Design Scotland
Comments are welcome – only courteous ones (as per our T&Cs) – but they can only be posted by signed-in members. To sign up, for as little as £12 a year, please go here. Please note, comments appear following moderation (so expect a delay when submitting).