Land ownership: a moment to celebrate, Benny Higgins

IN the seemingly eternal debate in Scotland about the ownership and use of land, moments of mutual celebration are few and far between. All too often, rhetoric resorts to ‘them and us’,  perceived rights and wrongs, downtrodden communities and overbearing landowners.

For many, it is a convenient characterisation that helps fuel discontent and a clamour for even more legislation and regulation.

However, we can all now savour a moment that hopefully can bring some light, rather than the prevalent heat, to the debate.

The Langholm Initiative’s achievement in completing the acquisition of more than 10,000 acres of land in total near Langholm, doubling the size of its Tarras Valley Nature Reserve, is truly remarkable and an emphatic community buy-out success.

The land was acquired from Buccleuch, a business forged in rural land use such as forestry and farming but is now also heavily involved in renewable energy, hospitality and commercial property. From our point of view, the community buy-out was to be welcomed in that it helped us continue to reduce our overall land footprint while securing what we confidently believe can be a viable future for this particular piece of land. 

Most importantly of all, this was a triumph for common sense and cause, and a clear demonstration of what can be achieved when people decide to work together constructively.

This transfer of land in the south of Scotland was not the consequence of some ideological battle over land ownership, but the product of a process that began three years ago when Buccleuch explored the possibility of selling Langholm Moor.

We did not know then what would happen or who (if anyone) would be interested. We undertook an extensive public consultation exercise in line with protocols expected by government and its agencies and this led us to numerous meetings with community groups to listen to their interests and ambitions. That extensive consultation paved the way for two community buy-outs from Newcastleton and Langholm – both at land values which all agreed on.

Both community bodies not only knew that they wanted to acquire the land but also what they wanted to do with it – a factor that was crucial in them attracting a wide range of funding.

We hear all the time about ‘learning lessons’ and that could well apply to the land ownership issue in Scotland. For too long, the discussion has been rooted in the past and the only possible solutions being adversarial. If we are to learn anything from the sale of land around Langholm Moor, it is that it does not have to be that way.  

Use of legislation was not required. When an issue arose, it was discussed and a way through found. Everyone respected one another’s view and position. 

It may be too much to expect that our shared experience could become a blueprint for future transfers of land. However, dismantling some of the barricades that appear around land debate is not a bad starting point. If we will not always agree, then at least the constructive conversations may yield more moments of celebration. 

Benny Higgins is executive chair of Buccleuch

This article first appeared in The Scotsman newspaper, here, for which grateful thanks

Picture credit: Simon Thorp / Media House International

Comments are welcome – only courteous ones (as per our T&Cs) – but they can only be posted by signed-in members. To sign up, for as little as £12 a year, please go here. Please note, comments appear following moderation (so expect a delay when submitting).